Surah 47

Faith: Islam
Text: The Holy Qur'an
Volume: The Meaning of the Holy Quran
Author: Khalifa

Overview

Surah 47, often titled 'Muhammad' or 'Al-Qital' (The Fighting), represents a pivotal moment in Islamic textual development where the community transitions from passive persecution to active military engagement. The text establishes a rigorous theological framework where humanity is divided strictly into two camps: those who believe and follow Muhammad, and those who disbelieve. The central argument is that God tests believers through warfare to distinguish the truthful from the hypocrites. It explicitly commands the physical engagement of enemies ('strike the necks') and warns that refusal to fight or spend money in God's cause is evidence of hypocrisy. The text introduces a high-stakes soteriology where even the good works of believers can be 'nullified' or rendered 'in vain' through disobedience or apostasy. It promises a sensory Paradise of rivers (water, milk, wine, honey) for the righteous, while threatening disbelievers with boiling water in Hell. Ultimately, it presents a transactional relationship with the Divine: 'If you support GOD, He will support you.'

Key Figures

  • GOD (The Sovereign/Judge)
  • Muhammad (The Messenger)
  • The Believers (Those who strive)
  • The Disbelievers (Those whose works are nullified)
  • Hypocrites (Those with diseased hearts)
  • Martyrs (Those killed in the cause of God)

Doctrines Analyzed

Key theological claims identified in this text:

1

Nullification of Works (Hbt al-A'mal)

Assertion

God actively cancels or renders void the good deeds of those who disbelieve, oppose the messenger, or harbor hypocrisy.

Evidence from Text

Those who disbelieve and repel from the path of GOD, He nullifies their works. (Surah 47:1); ...He causes their works to be utterly in vain. (Surah 47:8)

Evangelical Comparison

In this text, the validity of one's life work is precarious. The doctrine of 'Hbt al-A'mal' (nullification of deeds) suggests that spiritual credit is accumulated but can be wiped out by specific sins (like hating revelation or cowardice in war). This stands in stark contrast to the Evangelical doctrine of Justification, where the believer's standing is based on the imputed righteousness of Christ (Romans 4:5). For the Christian, works are the fruit of salvation, not the root; thus, while rewards may be lost (1 Corinthians 3:15), salvation itself is secured by Christ's finished work, not maintained by the believer's performance.

2

Conditional Divine Support

Assertion

God's support and strengthening of the believer are contingent upon the believer first supporting God's cause.

Evidence from Text

O you who believe, if you support GOD, He will support you, and strengthen your foothold. (Surah 47:7)

Evangelical Comparison

Surah 47:7 presents a transactional theology: human initiative triggers divine response. 'If you support God' is the prerequisite for receiving divine strength. Evangelical theology reverses this order (Sola Gratia): God takes the initiative to save the helpless who cannot support Him. In the Bible, we love Him because He first loved us (1 John 4:19). The Quranic model here places the burden of initiating and maintaining the covenant relationship on the human actor's performance.

3

Sanctified Warfare (Qital)

Assertion

Physical warfare against disbelievers is a divine command and a test of faith.

Evidence from Text

If you encounter (in war) those who disbelieve, you may strike the necks... But He thus tests you by one another. (Surah 47:4)

Evangelical Comparison

The text elevates physical violence to a sacramental level—it is the method by which God 'tests' the believers. While the Old Testament contains accounts of theocratic warfare, the New Testament (the Evangelical baseline) abrogates this for the Church age, declaring that 'our struggle is not against flesh and blood' (Ephesians 6:12) and that those who live by the sword die by the sword (Matthew 26:52). Surah 47 makes killing in God's cause a primary vehicle for spiritual validation and entry into Paradise.

Comparative Analysis

Status: Yes

Theological Gap

The fundamental gap lies in the mechanism of redemption and the nature of the Kingdom. Surah 47 establishes a Kingdom advanced by the sword ('strike the necks') and maintained by human merit ('He nullifies their works'). Evangelicalism posits a Kingdom advanced by the preaching of the Gospel and maintained by the intercession of Christ. The Quranic text denies the sufficiency of faith alone, adding the necessity of martial striving and financial contribution to secure divine favor. Furthermore, the 'God' of Surah 47 is a reactive tester who blesses based on performance, whereas the God of the Bible is a proactive redeemer who blesses based on His covenant love.

Shared Values with Evangelicalism

  • Monotheism (v. 19)
  • Reality of Judgment/Hell
  • Necessity of repentance/forgiveness
  • Condemnation of hypocrisy
  • Sovereignty of God

Friction Points

1 Critical

Sola Fide (Faith Alone)

Salvation is contingent on works (fighting, spending) not being nullified; faith alone is insufficient.

2 Major

Sola Gratia (Grace Alone)

Divine support is conditional on human support (v. 7); God is a responder to human effort.

3 Critical

Christology (Sufficiency of Christ)

Muhammad is the central figure to be believed (v. 2); Jesus is absent; salvation is via the Quranic path.

4 Major

Nature of the Kingdom (Spiritual vs. Political)

The Kingdom is advanced through physical warfare and killing (v. 4).

Semantic Warnings

Terms that have different meanings between traditions:

"Forgiveness"

In This Text

A remission of sins granted by God, often contingent on belief and fighting (v. 2, 4), which must be repeatedly asked for (v. 19).

In Evangelicalism

A complete cleansing based on the shed blood of Christ, granted once for all upon justification (Hebrews 10:10-14).

Example: In Surah 47:19, Muhammad is told to ask forgiveness for his sins; in 1 John 1:9, Christians confess sins to restore fellowship, but their judicial forgiveness was secured at the Cross.

"Peace"

In This Text

Surrender or cessation of hostilities, which is forbidden if the believers are in a position of strength (v. 35).

In Evangelicalism

Reconciliation with God through Christ (Romans 5:1) and living peaceably with all men (Romans 12:18).

Example: Surah 47:35 commands 'do not surrender in pursuit of peace' while promising victory; Jesus says 'Blessed are the peacemakers' (Matthew 5:9).

Soteriology (Salvation)

Salvation Defined: Entry into a sensory Paradise (v. 15) and avoidance of Hell.

How Attained: By believing in God and Muhammad, working righteousness, fighting in God's cause, and not having one's works nullified.

Basis of Assurance: There is no absolute assurance; one must strive until the end. God 'tests' to expose true qualities (v. 31).

Comparison to Sola Fide: Surah 47:2 links forgiveness to 'those who believe AND work righteousness.' Ephesians 2:8-9 states salvation is 'by grace through faith... not of works.' The Quranic formula is Faith + Works = Salvation; the Biblical formula is Faith = Salvation + Works.

Mandates & Requirements

Explicit Commands

  • Strike the necks of disbelievers in war (v. 4)
  • Take captives and ransom or free them (v. 4)
  • Obey God and the Messenger (v. 33)
  • Do not waver or surrender in pursuit of peace (v. 35)
  • Spend money in the cause of God (v. 38)
  • Ask forgiveness for sins (v. 19)
  • Know that there is no god beside God (v. 19)

Implicit Obligations

  • Study the Quran carefully (v. 24)
  • Avoid doubting or questioning difficult commands (v. 20-21)
  • Demonstrate willingness to die for the cause (v. 20)
  • Treat relatives well (implied by negative example in v. 22)

Ritual Requirements

  • Asking for forgiveness (Istighfar)
  • Spending/Charity (Infaq)

Evangelism Toolkit

Practical tools for engagement and dialogue:

Discovery Questions

Open-ended questions to promote reflection:

  1. In verse 33, it says works can be 'in vain.' How do you know for certain that your current works haven't been nullified by a mistake you made?
  2. Verse 15 describes Paradise with rivers of wine. Why is something prohibited on earth (wine) considered the ultimate reward in heaven? What does this tell us about the nature of holiness?
  3. Verse 19 commands Muhammad to ask forgiveness for his sins. If the Prophet needed forgiveness, who can we look to as a sinless mediator between us and God?
  4. Verse 4 commands striking the necks of disbelievers. How do you reconcile this with the earlier Meccan verses about patience? Which command applies to your relationship with me as a Christian today?

Redemptive Analogies

Bridges from this text to the Gospel:

1

The Ransom

Gospel Connection:

Just as a captive of war needs a ransom to be set free, humanity is captive to sin. We cannot free ourselves.

Scripture Bridge: Mark 10:45 - 'For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.'
2

The Need for Intercession

Gospel Connection:

The text acknowledges the universal need for forgiveness and the role of one praying for many. Jesus is the ultimate High Priest who intercedes perfectly.

Scripture Bridge: Hebrews 7:25 - 'Therefore he is able to save completely those who come to God through him, because he always lives to intercede for them.'

Spiritual Weight

Burdens this text places on adherents:

1 Uncertainty/Fear of Nullification Severe

The believer lives under the constant threat that their 'account' of good deeds can be wiped to zero by God due to disobedience or doubt. This creates a 'spiritual bankruptcy' anxiety.

2 Performance Pressure Moderate

The requirement to 'support God' to receive support places the infinite weight of maintaining the relationship on the finite human.

3 Cognitive Dissonance Moderate

The command to not question (v. 24) clashes with the human need for understanding, forcing the adherent to suppress rational doubts about violence or morality.

4 Burden of Violence Severe

The mandate to engage in physical violence or view it as a holy duty creates a heavy psychological burden, conflicting with natural human empathy.

+ Epistemology

Knowledge Source: Revelation (The Quran) is the primary source; empirical observation of history is secondary.

Verification Method: Adherents are told to 'study the Quran carefully' (v. 24) and observe the historical destruction of past disbelieving communities (v. 10).

Evangelical Contrast: While both faiths rely on revelation, Evangelicalism tests new claims against the established apostolic deposit (Galatians 1:8). Surah 47 dismisses critical questioning as a 'lock on the mind' (v. 24) or a sign of a diseased heart, whereas the Bible encourages testing the spirits (1 John 4:1).

+ Textual Criticism

Dating: Medinan period (approx. 624-625 AD), likely after the Battle of Badr.

Authorship: Attributed to Muhammad via Gabrielic revelation; critical scholars view it as part of the Medinan redaction reflecting the community's military needs.

Textual Issues: The Khalifa translation uses 'GOD' in all caps (representing Allah) and translates specific terms like 'Rabb' as Lord. Verse 15's description of rivers of wine is notable given the prohibition of wine elsewhere (Surah 5:90), interpreted here as non-intoxicating or a reward denied on earth.